Halifax Initiative Home Page

OECD

Based in Paris, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development is the forum in which countries define common policies, and discuss emerging issues on export credits. There are 24 Participants, including Australia, Canada, the Czech Republic, the European Community (15 countries), Japan, Korea, New Zealand, Norway, Switzerland and the United States. The European Commission negotiates on behalf of the EU Member states. Observers to the negotiations typically include the Berne Union, the WTO Secretariat and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, as well as non-OECD members that have ECAs, such as India and Brazil.

The OECD Arrangement
The Arrangement on Officially Supported Export Credits (the “Arrangement”) was initially negotiated in 1978 and revised most recently in 2007. The main purpose of the Arrangement is to provide the institutional framework for regulating or disciplining export credits. Among other things, it sets limits on the terms and conditions for export credits involving credit terms of two years or more, and sets guidelines for tied aid and for risk-based premium fees. In theory, it seeks to avoid competition based on who grants the most favourable financing terms, and instead encourages competition for export sales based on the price and quality of the goods and services being exported. The Arrangement is not binding on OECD members; rather, it is a ‘gentleman’s agreement’ among governments who agree to be participants.

The OECD Common Approaches on Environment and Officially Supported Export Credits
In 2000, following increasing pressure to take the environment into account in export-credit funded projects from civil society , international press attention, and ministerial mandates from the OECD itself and the Group of Eight largest economies (G-8), policy negotiations on environmental issues began at the OECD Working Party on Export Credits and Credit Guarantees (otherwise know as the Export Credit Group or ECG). In December 2001, the members of the ECG finalized a proposed set of guidelines for ECAs called the 'Common Approaches'. Despite broad agreement on Revision 6 of the Common Approaches, the US judged the agreement to be insufficient, and failed to endorse the agreement. Nevertheless, the rest of the OECD members decided to adopt the text on a voluntary basis.
 
In September 2003, negotiations were reopened in an effort to achieve consensus on the agreement. Civil society, trade unions and the business community were consulted on a draft of the document, but governments, notably Germany, Japan, Italy and Spain, all refused to allow the draft to be circulated. Countries eventually agreed to consult with civil society on an ad hoc country basis. Three months later, in December 2003, governments finally reached a consensus on the agreement, and began implementing the recommendation in January 2004. The text was further revised in 2006-2007, with articles that substantially weakened the agreement.

Section Articles

Press Responses: Friday, May 13, 2005

Dams Could Win OECD Support

Press Responses: December 12, 2003

Two US stories on the new 2003 OECD agreement on Export Credit and the Environment (Wall Street Journal, BNA)

Comments on the OECD 2003 Common Approaches, Rev. 2 - November 20, 2003

This letter critiques various elements of the 2003 OECD agreement on Export Credits and the Environment, Revision 2. The agreement contains a number of significant loopholes that give countries the opportunity to diverge from pursuing a common approaches to the environment - one of the key objectives of the agreement.

EDC response re comments - January 20, 2004

This response thanks us for submitting our comments on the OECD Common Approaches, found to be constructive and relevant. The letter highlights the importance of the formal adoption of the recommendations and the consistency that this will generate among ECAs, while acknowledging the room for improvement that still exists. Time and the type of projects ECAs continue to support, will of course determine whether countries are consistent or not, and the extent of the need for improvement.

Press Responses : Tuesday, November 11, 2003

The Cobwebs on Credit - Every once in a while, a major construction project gets a headline or two in the international press. We read about how the Three Gorges Dam is radically changing the landscape in southwestern China, or about ecological concerns over oil and gas pipelines being built on Sakhalin Island, in Russia’s Far East. What rarely make headlines are the workings of the export finance institutions that make such projects possible...

"Race to the Bottom, Take II" (September 2003)

This report critiques Revision 6 of the OECD Common Approaches on environment and export credits, and documents nine projects (including the Cernavoda2 nuclear power plant and the Three Gorges dam) which have had devastating environmental, social and human rights impacts, and which have all received (or will soon recieve) funding by Export Credit Agencies, including Canada's EDC. The report argues that the Common Approaches did little to mitigate the devastating social, environmental and human rights impacts of ECA-funded projects.

Environment Minister response re OECD - July 3, 2003

This letter acknowledges the importance of considering the environmental impacts of export credit financed projects, but argues that although this has been a source of discussion at past G8 meetings, since it was not a theme of the 2003 Minister's meeting, nothing specific was mentioned on it. It nevertheless affirms Canada's commitments to the common approaches at the OECD.

Letter to Environment Minister - April 22, 2003

This letter raises some concerns about EDC's environmental review directive (ERD), and the OECD's "Common Approaches" (from which the ERD was derived), and asks the Minister to put further negotiations of ECA environmental and transparency reforms, and participation of civil society in all environmental decisions, on the G8 Environment Minister's communique and back on the OECD Export Credit Group agenda.

Press Responses : Monday, December 3, 2001

Talks collapse on environment credit rules (Financial Times)

Press Responses : Tuesday, December 4, 2001

Export credit agencies seen dodging responsibility (IPS)

Press Responses : Saturday, May 26, 2001

Environment: Activists fault wealthy nations for foot dragging (InterPress Service)

Press Responses : Thursday, September 23, 1999

Export credit agencies seek to improve environmental standards (Canadian Press)

The Halifax Initiative

The Halifax Initiative is a Canadian coalition of development, environment, faith-based, human rights and labour groups.

Our goal is to fundamentally transform the international financial system and its institutions, namely the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and export credit agencies.

By doing so, we hope to achieve poverty eradication, environmental sustainability and the full realization of human rights.

Donations

Monthly Issue Updates

Issue Updates

Our Sister Sites

Design: Thant Aung,
Mike Buckthought 

CMS: OpenConcept
(Back-End | GPL)